Obligatory medical device diagnostics.
- Abdominal ultrasonography (ultrasonography of abdominal organs).
- Indications of appendicitis:
- “Shooting target figure” (diameter > 6 mm) with anechoic mesh cap.
- Diameter (between longitudinal muscles and serosa) > 6 mm + echogenic environmental responseIn one study, children in whom the external diameter of the appendix was ≥ 7 mm had more than a 9-fold higher risk (odds ratio [OR]: 9.4]) of having acute appendicitis compared with children with smaller diameters.
- Evidence for perforation:
- Abolition of wall differentiation, esp. absence of echo-rich submucosa (= double-layered).
- Inflammatory conglomerate
- Abscess formation (formation of an encapsulated pus cavity)
- Echogenic free fluid
- Paralytic ileus (intestinal obstruction due to intestinal paralysis).
Note: Color-coded Doppler sonography (FKDS) may help visualize hyperemia of the appendiceal wall. Notice: In a meta-analysis, abdominal ultrasonography for suspected appendicitis achieved a sensitivity of only 69% (percentage of diseased patients in whom the disease is detected by use of the procedure, i.e., a positive finding occurs) and a specificity of 81% (probability that actually healthy individuals who do not have the disease in question are also detected as healthy by the test).
- Indications of appendicitis:
Optional medical device diagnostics – depending on the results of the history, physical examination, laboratory diagnostics and obligatory medical device diagnostics – for differential diagnostic clarification.
- Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen (abdominal CT) – if perforation of the appendix is suspected; the following signs are most notable:
- Appendix thickened
- Surrounding fatty tissue changed inflammatory
- Appendicolith (fecal stones) in the appendix appendix (visible in up to 40% of cases).
- Magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen (abdominal MRI) – indicated especially when sonography (ultrasound examination) is insufficient in young people or pregnant women; good representation of complications.
Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS)
Feature | Score |
Loss of appetite | 1 |
Nausea or vomiting | 1 |
Pain migration to the right lower quadrant | 1 |
Fever ≥ 38 °C | 1 |
Maximum defensive voltage in the lower right quadrant | 2 |
Pain in right lower quadrant on hopping, coughing, or percussion (palpating exam) | 2 |
Leukocytosis ≥ 10,000/mm3 | 1 |
Neutrophils ≥ 75% | 1 |
Evaluation of the risk of appendicitis:
- Score 0-3 = low risk
- Point value 4-6 = medium risk
- Point value 7-10 = high risk
Below, sonography results (negative, positive, equivocal appendicitis findings) are presented in relation to their prediction of appendicitis (in %) in combination with PAS scores.
PAS values/risk | Negative sonography | Positive sonography | Doubtful sonography |
Low risk | 100 % | 73 % | 9 % |
Medium risk | 94 % | 90 % | 13 % |
High risk | 81 % | 97 % | 47 % |
Conclusion:
- Children at high risk according to PAS score and negative sonography must be carefully monitored
- Children at intermediate or high risk and positive sonography are candidates for appendectomy
- Children at intermediate risk according to PAS score and negative or equivocal sonography require observation