Risks and complications | Vibratory lipolysis

Risks and complications

As with any procedure, possible risks and complications must be mentioned for vibration lipolysis. On the one hand, wound infection can occur and thrombosis can form after the procedure. During the procedure, the patient may feel the movements of the cannula and this may cause discomfort.

Swelling and bruising must be expected from the outset of the vibration lipolysis. And last but not least, it should be noted that there are only a few doctors who offer this procedure to date. However, it is advisable to choose a doctor who is already familiar with this procedure, otherwise the risk of further complications is greater.

Regarding the further course after a vibratory lipolysis, it should be noted that in the first 24 hours immediately after the procedure, a clear liquid usually emerges from the skin incision and causes it to stick together. However, this is no longer dangerous and the body reabsorbs the fluid on its own afterwards. A compression bandage should be worn for up to four weeks after the procedure to prevent thrombosis.

In the first few days, bruising and swelling are also to be expected. This usually makes the skin over the treated area hard and the sensation in this area can be reduced for up to three months. This is usually described as a feeling of numbness.

After about two to three days one is usually fit for work again. However, prolonged sitting or lying can be painful for the following week. Finally, after about two to three months, one can observe that skin that has become too loose contracts again and thus appears taut again.

Cost of vibration lipolysis

The cost of vibrational lipolysis varies depending on the part of the body.Some guidelines for this are about 5,000 – 6,000 € for areas such as thighs, bottom and hips, about 6,000 € for belly and waist, about 1,500 € for arms or double chin and about 2,500 € for the knee. It should be mentioned that liposuction is offered up to 50% cheaper, especially in eastern countries. However, the technique used is often outdated and the hygienic standards usually do not meet the local ones.

This often leads to subsequent wound infections and other complications which, in the worst case, may make a new procedure necessary. There is no compensation for damages and so the intervention is much more expensive for those affected.